Paul Janka's doctrine on dating would seem to be: it's a numbers game. And the odds are on your side.
Take Paul Janka's home base of New york as an example. There's millions of hot, single women out there... hot, single women just waiting to meet someone. If you know any women living in New york city over the age of 18 and under 32, Paul Janka probably has her number. That's because Paul's been hustling in the area for years -- walking up to every gorgeous, hot, cute, and sometimes even marginally cute girl he passes.
So what if one girl doesn't want you... there's ten more that will Just think about that...
It's no wonder that Paul Janka stirs up so much controversy.
After all, he approaches pick up like a scientist in a lab coat. He calculates his success with a number-to-successful date ratio. He's minimized the dating game to a normal "cost per score," and consequently he fails to even want to consider what he does to be "dating." In his own words: "I enjoy the hustle."
To some it may seem off-putting, but it certainly is effective. A woman could very easily be intimidated... even offended... by an approach like this. Maybe that's why Paul Janka has appeared on tv programs like Dr. Phil, Tyra and The Today Show.
Yet his haters are generally shocked to discover that he has a strong and abundant admiration for females. Paul's mother and father got divorced and it ended up being mostly his mother who took care of him. His closeness to his mother is a significant reason why he has such a keen comprehension of the female psyche. Is he sexist? The jury's still out on that...
But is his approach ethical? But I'd have to counter with this: are girls ethical?
Paul Janka specifies what the average guy operating in the Seduction Community have made known for a reasonable length of time: girls have an ulterior motive. Almost all women have their desired guy in mind, their idea of a fabulous date, and a whole handful of down & dirty tricks to acquire all the things they want from a guy.
You'll end up gettingnothingif you're not careful. You'll also get to pay for everything while wasting your time... until she pushes you aside for the next chump with a fat wallet. Does that sound fair?
Not just that, the typical girl is significantly more proficient at the mating game than all men are. Think of all the moolah they spend on hair, makeup and clothes. Now you should consider of that as money and time spent on maximizing their seduction value... including all the time they spend reading those magazines filled with sex and relationship advice.
You may think you are a hero who will win using old-fashioned courtship nonsense and a "touchy-feely" disposition. Or possibly you happen to be a hotshot with two fistfuls of cash and a Ferrari who assumes he can decide to buy everything he wants. So what does this all mean...?
Walking into the dating game unarmed is like stepping into a lions den. Now... would you say these girls mistaken?
If you answered yes... then Paul Janka's methods are quite possibly not your style. This is simply because Paul teaches guys to do exactly the same thing women do: have a sharp idea of what they desire, and strong agenda for how they'll get it. He is a man with a very pragmatic world view. Young ladies are likely to try and get exactly what they can from you. It's hustle or be hustled.
Does this mean that you're almost always likely to be successful?
In a word: No. No matter how confident you are, or how "solid" your game is, there will always be flakes, gold diggers, and uncontrollable circumstances. The most powerful approach, easiest escalation and most powerful psychological techniques on earth won't work every time on every girl. Paul Janka himself only has a closing rate of 9.8%
It's a numbers game but so what? As long as you've got the right attitude, you'll have more success with women.
